StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Socrates and Euthyphro - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
In the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro, we are met with the ‘Euthyphro dilemma’ that asks, “Is the pious loved by the Gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the Gods?” (Cahn, 23-25). In simpler terms it means that, is morally good…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.4% of users find it useful
Socrates and Euthyphro
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Socrates and Euthyphro"

Socrates and Euthyphro In the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro, we are met with the ‘Euthyphro dilemma’ that asks, “Is the pious loved by the Gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the Gods?” (Cahn, 23-25). In simpler terms it means that, is morally good really loved by the Gods for being morally good, or do we term a certain attribute to be morally good because it has been said so by the Gods. Since Plato posed this question in this dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro, it has been the central theme of many theological and philosophical debates and discussions over the centuries.

As Socrates and Euthyphro argue over the definition of piety, we will examine them to find out as to what facts are relevant in this dialogue of Euthyphro. Euthyphro, a priest comes to the court to prosecute his own father, on charges of killing the former’s servant. In this context Socrates (who is in the court because he has been accused of impiety) wanted to find out as to what is really meant by the term piety (or morally good), since Euthyphro, by his own version, is doing an act of piety by defying all conventions and prosecuting his own kin, his father.

So Socrates starts by asking Euthyphro the definition of piety, to which Euthyphro says his very act of coming to the court to prosecute his father in order to fight for justice, is piety (first definition). However, Socrates disagrees and tells him, that the act is certainly pious, but does not define the term piety. To explain this in simpler terms we can say take any sentence as an example. When asked to define the term ‘bread’, the sentence ‘this basket contains bread’, may be a correct statement, but certainly does not define the term ‘bread’.

Realizing his mistake Euthyphro then comes forward with the second definition, where he says piety is an act loved by the gods. Here again Socrates intervenes, and tells him that there may be instances where the Gods may disagree amongst themselves. Then the act cannot be pious, since there is no clear consensus between the Gods. The third definition that Euthyphro then puts forward is that acts of piety are loved by all the Gods. After this definition, Socrates puts forward the question “Is what youre doing pious because it is loved by the gods, or do the gods love what youre doing because what youre doing is pious?

”(Cahn, ibid). Here lies the dilemma, that is, if we accept certain act to be pious just because God commanded them to be so, then the distinction between good and bad becomes the sole prerogative of the Gods. Since there is no clear reason as to why Gods should only favor justice; it might be that they favor the opposite act of justice, like murder, too. In that case impiety and injustice would also become morally good. Here Socrates is trying to say that, if a person follows morality, strictly adhering to the moral rules supposedly defined by the Gods, then he is being immature, like a child who follows rules without asking for reasons behind these imposed regulations.

Thus, we find that the moral rules or ethics that undoubtedly bring about happiness and justice stand quite apart, from Gods’ commands, and it is to these distinctly separate morality rules that the Gods must also conform. Since we can see that acts of justice and piety brings about general happiness we do not need God’s attestation to declare them as morally correct. So a pious act can be said to be an act or morality, and such acts solely aim to bring about happiness, and it is also God’s will that all humans achieve happiness and contentment in their lives.

So our basic theory that we should do good because it is as the Gods command, is not correct, instead we should choose to do acts that bring about happiness and a sense of fulfillment. Thus Socrates separates the act of piety from its divine sphere, and places it on its own within the very grasps of human realms, a blasphemous thought indeed for the theists of all ages. Euthyphro defines murder as an act of impiety, and that “murder and stealing from the temples warrant prosecution. and not prosecuting is impious” (Vaught, 108).

Here Euthyphro thus sets himself as an example of piety (he gives an example of Zeus in a similar situation who had imprisoned his own father), and judges the actions of his father in relation to that. Works CitedCahn, S. Classics of Western Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2002. Print.Vaught, C. The Quest for Wholeness. Albany: SUNY Press, 1982. Print.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Socrates and Euthyphro Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Socrates and Euthyphro Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1571394-socrates-and-euthyphro
(Socrates and Euthyphro Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Socrates and Euthyphro Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1571394-socrates-and-euthyphro.
“Socrates and Euthyphro Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1571394-socrates-and-euthyphro.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Socrates and Euthyphro

A Dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro

Euthyphro Name University Euthyphro Plato's Euthyphro is set as a dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro, the namesake of the play.... hellip; So begins a dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro discussing mainly, the topic of holiness.... ?? (5e) Initially, this is how the concept of holiness emerges in the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro and it soon takes a prominent position in the dialogue as it becomes the main topic of their conversation as they wait to be shown into court for their respective cases....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Explain Socrates' claim that the unexamined life is not worth living (Apology)

The dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro revolve around the issue of piety.... Briefly, both Socrates and Euthyphro are involved in this aspect of piety.... This paper explores the meaning and the significance of the Socrates claim that “the unexamined life is not worth living” focusing on the Apology and euthyphro.... euthyphro suggests that piety is all about prosecuting anyone who is guilty of murder but after challenged by Socrates, he states that piety is something that is dear to gods, arguing that piety is what all the gods love whereas impiety is what all the gods hate....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Moral Relativism and Plato’s Euthyphro

Similarly, there are lots of perspectives regarding the role or identity of truth.... Truth can be ‘subjective', objective', ‘relative' or ‘absolute'.... The idea that the truth is relative implies that… Dooyeweerd's contention of truth focuses on the relative aspects of truth.... Kant and other thinkers emphasize on knowledge, but Dooyeweerd focuses both on the aspects of ‘truth' and the ‘knowledge of truth'. Relative truth is a sort of perceived The area of application for the relative truth is completely a matter of individual belief and may not apply to anything else further....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Euthyphro: Discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro Is Focused on the Definition of Piety

The main discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro is focused on the definition of piety.... Socrates… Universality of principles of piety is discussed both by Socrates and Euthyphro.... The main discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro is focused on the definition of piety.... Universality of principles of piety is discussed both by Socrates and Euthyphro.... There is a constant arguing between Socrates and Euthyphro....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Moral Problems Raised by the Immoralists

In this argumentative essay, I will focus on finding out whether Plato provide adequate solution to the moral problems raised by immoralists and whether he provides good reasons to suggest that the good life is the best life (Melchert, 45)Plato's dialogue referred to as Euthyphro brings out a discussion that occurred between socrates and his counterpart, Euthyphro.... This is observed when Socrates asks euthyphro to reply to the question “What is piety?...
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Text and tradition

Attempt to specify the concept of justice leads Socrates and Euthyphro to the thought that justice involves interaction with Gods in this or that sense.... As a result Socrates and Euthyphro return to the thought that piety is a gratification to God.... The dialogue between socrates and Euthryphro aims to distinguish whether rational understanding of the concept of piety, holiness and Gods in generally is possible.... Initially euthyphro suggests to define piety… Socrates, in turn, rejects such option, explaining that this is rather the example of piety than the definition....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Attitude of the Socrates towards the gods in Euthyphro

The discussion of Plato commonly referred to as the Euthyphro is a dialogue that took place between Socrates and Euthyphro that touches on what holiness (piety) is.... Attitude of the Socrates towards the gods in Euthyphro The discussion of Plato commonly referred to as the Euthyphro is a dialogue that took place between Socrates and Euthyphro that touches on what holiness (piety) is.... The two are involved (Socrates and Euthyphro) in matters that are of legal nature with Euthyphro being the plaintiff in the matter that is in the court awaiting trial....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

A Comparison of Plato and Aristotle on the Meaning and Significance of Political Life

This paper ''A Comparison of Plato and Aristotle on the Meaning and Significance of Political Life'' tells that politics and the state are part of society since it began.... It is a common understanding by everybody that it is unbearable to live in a world where there is no order.... nbsp;… Aristotle was a Greek truth seeker, a logician, while Plato was a scientist and a teacher....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us