StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

United Kingdom's Tribunal System Reforms - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
United Kingdom’s Tribunal System Reforms
Contemplation about tribunal reform in the United Kingdom began in 2006. Several legislations were prepared to contribute to the reform. Among these were the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill 2007…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.5% of users find it useful
United Kingdoms Tribunal System Reforms
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "United Kingdom's Tribunal System Reforms"

? United Kingdom’s Tribunal System Reforms Contemplation about tribunal reform in the United Kingdom began in 2006. Several legislations were prepared to contribute to the reform. Among these were the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill 2007. The Franks Report in 1957 did a comprehensive review of tribunals. Sir Oliver Franks gave openness, impartiality and fairness as the three principles to govern tribunal operations (Franks Report 1957, p.7). Sir Andrew Leggatt, a retired Lord Justice of Appeal headed the Leggatt review in 2001 also made several recommendations (Leggatt report 2001, pp.13). The government’s White Paper 2004 implemented these reviews’ recommendations gave birth to the Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council that replaced the old body, Council of tribunal (White Paper 2004, p.8). In 2005, the government established the Tribunal’s service as an executive agency of the Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA). Its function would be to accommodate the chief government run tribunals (Buck 2005, p.6). Following the appointment of Lord Justice Carwath as the first Senior President-designate of Tribunals, there was a publication of a Draft Bill in 2006. In November the same year, the House of Lords received the Tribunals, courts and Enforcement Bill (Buck 2006, pp 458-484) .There were a number of reasons for the reforms. First and foremost was in relation to the availability of reported decisions. The tribunal users experienced a lot of delays before they received responses to their applications and appeals. For this reason, the House of Commons made an inquiry into the Social Security and Child Support Commissioners (2000, pp 6-15). Some jurisdictions lacked hard copy reports while others had poor electronic media submission of reports. Secondly, the method of selection of cases varied amongst the jurisdictions. Rather than depend on rational thinking to select cases, tribunals depended on their historical development and procedural rules. Third, tribunals developed a common law system instead of a case-law system. This reduced their flexibility in determining case. Moreover, it watered down the role of a tribunal which is to avoid a formal doctrine that would result in binding precedents (Farmer 1974, p.21). The tribunal system experienced real change after the creation of the Councils of Tribunals. In 2008, the Upper Tribunal and the First-tier Tribunal were created. These two tribunals replaced the abundance of tribunals that were there before. In addition to that, there was a harmonization of procedures. Consequently, this reduced cases of separate jurisdictions each with their own procedure and system. A total of 107 tribunals were transferred into these two. However, the Employment Tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal maintained their jurisdictions (Industrial Law Journal 2009, p. 418). The tribunals are divided into chambers. Each chamber takes up a general title dealing with issues that relate to the title. In light of the above discussion, tribunals deal with a range of issues. One of the issues at hand is the government’s proposal to give tribunals the power to oversee euthanasia or assisted suicide. Regulation of euthanasia under criminal law remains to be a contentious issue in medical law. According to Smith, England’s law makers have remained adamant in charting a clear way to handle this issue (1996, p.335). As it stands right now, England’s courts and legislators are not willing to remove the objection to the practice of euthanasia. Criminal law considers any wrongful act that leads to the loss of life as homicide. The most common of such acts is murder which earns one life imprisonment. A deliberate act of ending a life is murder. Therefore, even if a doctor ends a life upon the patient’s request, the law classifies his act as that of murder. There are cases where doctors have been charged with murder where they performed euthanasia. Dr. John Bodkin Adams, administered painkillers (The Times 1981, p. 1, 12). However, the patient died. Dr. Leonard Arthur’s patient died after the doctor failed to administer treatment. The courts have remained uncertain on euthanasia, especially cases that regard infants. It remains unclear under which circumstances doctors should continue with further treatment and under which they should limit treatment. This played out in the Re C and Re J cases. In the Re C case, the child was moribund (All England Law Reports 1989, p. 782). The hospital sought authority that would stop them from administering naso- gastric feeding or antibiotics should it be necessary. The court approved of this. In contrast to this, the child in case Re J was not dying as all England Law Report stated (1990, pp.930). He had severe brain damage from which he had fits. Thus, he needed assistance in breathing. In this case, the court decided that it did not have any legal obligation to make a decision. Whether to resuscitate the child or not, was up to the doctor and the parents. In his review, Dr.Tallis argues that the provision of clear legislation will go a long way in removing the ambiguity of the situation (2007, p.9). He advocates for legalization of assisted suicide for patients that are terminally ill and undergoing intolerable pain. The Dutch government also faced the same crisis, not knowing under which circumstances to allow euthanasia and assisted suicide. However, in 2001, The Dutch government enacted a legislation that allowed children as young as 12 years to undergo either procedure (Gorsuch 2006, pp.163). This would only happen after the medical practitioners had established that the child was undergoing intolerable suffering. Gorsuch argues that if people who request euthanasia receive it, this provision should also be there for those who may want it but are not courageous to ask for it (2007, pp.330). In other words, the doctor should be at liberty to carry out euthanasia or assisted suicide once they establish that the patient is suffering. Once they do this, the society should not condemn doctors. With such debates, it is difficult to understand how tribunals will handle euthanasia and assisted suicide. One may argue that these tribunals have undergone transformation recently, and may be early to give them such a sensitive issue to handle. Secondly, it appears as though the main court system is avoiding dealing with the issue at hand once and for all. Thus, they are throwing it to the tribunals to handle the matter. However, another school of thought may hold that tribunals are best placed to handle cases regarding euthanasia and assisted suicide. This is because the nature of tribunals is that they are informal and handle each case independently. By following a case-law system, they do not set precedents for future reference. Thus, one cannot use a past case to argue out their way in a present case. Secondly, treating each case independently will enable tribunal judges to make better decisions than their counterparts since they will do thorough scrutiny of the information at hand. In conclusion, Tribunals have come a long way. The reforms will contribute significantly to better service delivery. Streamlining the system has ensured that there are less, if no discrepancies in the procedures applied. People are assured of quality service. However, with regards to giving the tribunal's jurisdiction over euthanasia and assisted suicide, the UK government needs to do thorough research on its pros and cons. In addition to that, legislation needs to give clear directions concerning the matte References Buck, T 2005, “Administrative Justice and Alternative Dispute Resolution: the Australian experience,” Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA), DCA Research Series 9/05, DCA, London, p.6. Buck, T 2006, ‘Precedent in Tribunals and The Development of Principles,’ Civil Justice Quarterly, Vol. 25(4) pp.458-484. Farmer, J.A.1974, Tribunals and Government, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, pp.21. Franks report (1957) Report of the Committee on Administrative, Tribunals and Enquiries, p.7. Gorsuch, NM 2006, The future of assisted suicide and euthanasia, Princeton University Press, pp.163. Gorsuch, NM 2007, “A reply to Raymond Tallis on the Legalization of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia,” The Journal of Legal Medicine, pp.330. House of Commons Select Committee, 2000, “Social Security and Child Support Commissioners: Fourth Report of session 1999-2000,” pp.6-15. Leggatt report (2001) Tribunals for Users–One System, One Service: report of the review of tribunals, The Stationery Office, London, pp.13. Re C (a minor) (wardship: medical treatment). 1989, All England Law Reports, pp. 782. Re J (a minor: wardship: medical treatment). 1990, All England Law Reports, pp. 930. Smith, M.A 1996, Euthanasia: the law in the United Kingdom, British Medical Buletin, pp.334. Something Old, Something New: the New Tribunal System, 2009, Industrial Law Journal, Industrial Law Society, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp.418. Tallis, R Jan 24 2007, “Stop Me,” Times Literary, London,p.9. The Times, 6 November 1981; p.1, 12. White Paper (2004), Transforming Public Services: Complaints, Redress and Tribunals, Cm 6243, The Stationery Office, London, p.8. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“United Kingdom's Tribunal System Reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
United Kingdom's Tribunal System Reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1441706-a-proposal-to-institute-a-tribunal-justice-scheme
(United Kingdom'S Tribunal System Reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
United Kingdom'S Tribunal System Reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1441706-a-proposal-to-institute-a-tribunal-justice-scheme.
“United Kingdom'S Tribunal System Reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1441706-a-proposal-to-institute-a-tribunal-justice-scheme.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF United Kingdom's Tribunal System Reforms

The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

hellip; In 2009, a new innovation was introduced into the legal system of the United Kingdom.... However, many quarters felt that as long as the system was working, there was no need to change it or to hew closer to American counterparts.... The New Supreme Court of the united Kingdom: Unnecessary and Costly Reform or Idea Whose Time Has Come?... This paper will evaluate the debate and determine whether or not the Supreme Court of the united Kingdom was a step in the right direction....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Principal Powers available to the courts in England & Wales

Tribunal courts and enforcement Act of 2007 has changed tribunal structure through radical reforms.... When one is, asked to design a system of justice he/she may decide to copy the Welsh and English model.... The judicial system for Anglo-Saxons was a combination of royal and local government even after had invaded in 1066.... Under the system of ordeal, the accused were forced to pick up a red-hot iron, to remove a stone from a cauldron of boiling water, and any other punishment, which is equally painful and dangerous....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

International Commercial Arbitration - Sharia, Saudi Arabia and English

Secondly, arbitration is effective in settling disputes that cannot be effectively resolved in the judicial system on account of lengthy judicial processes.... It is for these reasons why international commercial arbitration flourished along with the development and evolution of the international trade system.... For this purpose, it is now focusing on improving the judicial system in general and arbitration in particular.... The case was the same with the applicable law where the Law mandates for the arbitral tribunal to comply with what is stated in both applicable regulations as well as the provisions of Sharia....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Have Recent Reforms Increased Parliaments Ability to Hold the Executive to Account

Nevertheless, it has been commented that the doctrine does in fact influence everyday operations of the executive, legislature, and judiciary4, and Barnett argues that “Separation of powers…… runs like a thread throughout the constitution of the united Kingdom5....
9 Pages (2250 words) Article

Arbitration Systems in the UK and in the Middle East

As a background for the presentation and analysis of the research study results, the following sections of Chapter One comprise a review of several of the… The subject areas include a description of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, as well as the background on the historical beginnings of arbitration systems from the earliest days of recorded history to the development of The applications of these historical and legal foundations of arbitration are explored in the final section as they pertain to the origins of arbitration systems in the Middle East and in the united Kingdom....
66 Pages (16500 words) Essay

Human Rights Act and the Criminal Justice System

The united kingdom's Human Rights Act 1998 was enacted so as to have significant impact on the criminal justice system in England and Wales (Molan, 2001).... According to Janis, Kay, and Bradley, “the Human Rights Act 1998 was enacted on 9 November… The rights stated on the Human Rights Act 1998, apply to the entire population of the united Kingdom.... Nearly all the rights contained in the act are incorporated into law, and therefore the Human Rights “British courts must follow the principles of the Convention, and public bodies, like the police, schools, and hospitals must carry out their work in a way that upholds the Human Rights Act” (Life in the united Kingdom Advisory Group, 2004, p....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Anti-discrimination Law and Constitutional Law of the European Union

he proposed reform of UK's anti-discrimination laws represents changes and reforms in the legislative framework.... These proposed reforms seek to harmonise about 30 years worth of anti-discrimination laws.... And these reforms will eventually bring about changes and challenges for implementing bodies and agencies....
14 Pages (3500 words) Research Paper

The Fairness of Employment Tribunal in Making Decisions

This will include the composition of the tribunal, experience, and autonomy of the entire system in settling conflicts.... "The Fairness of Employment tribunal in Making Decisions" paper examines circumstances under which it is necessary for parties to settle issues through the tribunals instead of the normal court procedure.... It also examines the procedure involved in settling conflicts through the tribunal.... hellip; The tribunal exercised justice in both cases because they first assessed the circumstances which resulted in conflicts between employers and the workers....
9 Pages (2250 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us